Get Energy Smart! NOW!

Blogging for a sustainable energy future.

Get Energy Smart!  NOW! header image 2

Clean Energy Jobs: Stimulate Me

November 19th, 2009 · 14 Comments

Official unemployment is above 10 percent in America. Real un- and under-employment nears 20 percent. There is a reason that President Obama will hold a jobs summit and there is reason that members of Congress are speaking of a jobs bill.

Ealier this year, Congress passed a stimulus package. It is having an effect, but with unemployment above 10 percent, that impact is not enough.

Looking at the numbers, we shouldn’t be surprised. The financial frauds, collapse of the real-estate bubble, and other elements cost the United States something like $1.3-2 trillion in annual demand. Looking at the stimulus, there was all of about $600 billion or $300 billion per year. As at least half that figure simply made up for state and local government cutbacks. Thus, the stimulus package really has amounted to covering perhaps 10 percent of lost demand from the economy.

Thus, a jobs summit and jobs bill to come.

A summit and legislation to Stimulate job growth.

A core element of all government policy should be to seek win-win-win-win-win-win solutions, wherever possible. We don’t just needs jobs, which are desperately needed, but we need good jobs that help strengthen American society and the American economy so that this stimulating jolt helps turn us (the U.S.) toward a stronger, more sustainable, more prosperous Union.

NOTE: This is the first in a series of posts on Green Energy Jobs.

Stimulate

Etymology: From Latin stimulatus past participle of stimul? (“goad on”) .

Verb: to stimulate: To encourage into action. To arouse an organism to functional activity.

Synonyms: encourage, induce, provoke, animate, arouse, energize, energise, excite, perk up

Antonyms: de-energize, sedate, stifle

For eight long years, this nation was been de-energized, had productive advancing of the economy stifled, and good governance sedated nearly out of existence.

While we have seen change, change for the better, the sweeping change required to emerge truly fromthe miasma of the previous regime has not yet occurred.

Americans were have been stimulated via systematic malfeasance (governmental, fiscal, environmental) into a path that offers the potential for change for the better — across all facets of society, from the White House to my House.

Barack …

Stimulate me.

Stimulate us.

Stimulate the U.S. to something better.

Change is reality

The world around us is changing.

This is true when it comes to political power.

This is true in terms of “fiscal realities”.

This is true of the world around us and the people we know and …

Change is normal, nothing is static, … except when it isn’t, such as the reality and risk in the pure physical nature of the world that we are creating via our own actions.

What we desire is to drive change toward betterment, not worsening, of our situation. And, of the situation for generations to come. We have started that process, with an election and a move, for “Change we can Believe In”.

I … You … We have been stimulated to action and have been excited to the potential for something better to come.

A Stimulus package to come

In the days and weeks to come, details will emerge and battles fought over what will be one of the largest spending packages put together in American history in one of the shortest periods of time. Sparked by the miasma of continued (and worsening) unemployment, with bankers on Wall Street bankrolling record bonuses while too many Americans are pounding Main Street looking for a job (any job), massive economic and fiscal package, the 111th Congress and President Obama will lay out the structure for $100s of billions of of spending seeking to stimulate the American (and global) economy into job growth and on a path toward future prosperity.

In this package, we are almost certainly likely to see a mix of elements. There are likely to be ill-fated, near-term, ill-conceived ‘tax cuts’ to spark spending that are little more than renewed and repeated Tax Increases on the Unborn using money borrowed from the Chinese in the interim that have proven so successfully under Bush-Cheney Co malfeasance in fostering a stronger economy. And, there almost certainly will be efforts to spark jobs through improved building energy efficiency (Cash for Caulkers). There will be bad elements to the bill. There will be good job stimulating elements. What we must strive to do is minimize and marginalize the first (out with the bad) and maximize and centralize the second (in with the good).

Shorthand …

  • Stimulating jobs through “green”. Yes. GOOD
  • Stimulating jobs through strengthening societal fabric via, for example, Universal Health Care start-up costs. Yes. Good.
  • Stimulus jobs through building new roads and expanding airports and other
    pollution supporting / enabling infrastructure. Not so smart. Bad.
  • Stimulating not many jobs through pathways that have been shown not to work (e.g., more money for ‘abstinence only education’). Imbecilic. Very Bad.
  • Stimulating essentially no jobs through sending checks out via the bank accounts of
    foreigners? Idiocy. These are not ‘tax cuts’ or ‘rebates’ but tax
    increases on the unborn. It is time to end Tax Increases on the
    Unborn. They were idiocy under Bush. They will be idiocy tomorrow. BAD!

Failure to communicate with congress has
Been a problem for the longest, I guess
But maybe one day we can make some progress
Eminem … Stimulate

We should strive, in the stimulus package, to prod American on a win-win-win path of improved near-term economic activity (putting people back to work or to better employment), improved long term economic performance, a strengthened and more equitable society, and a more climate friendly society. We have the opportunity to Energize America out of the unemployment funk and toward something better. We have AN opportunity, an opportunity emergent through a smart jobs growth package, to achieve a real win-win-win-win-win path through an E2 solution path to Energize America toward a better future.

Stimulate US in a good way and a good direction

Here are some thoughts as to win-win-win concepts. Some small. Some large. All meeting these criteria:

  • Improve near-term economy
  • Improve long-term economic prospercts
  • Improve societal equity (avoid hurting it)
  • Reduce climate impacts
  • Create jobs … REAL JOBS … NOW!

Carbon Neutral Private Buildings Architecture 2030 (Ed Mazria) has proposed a $170 billion, two-year package to spur energy efficiency investments in private infrastructure (homes and commercial structures via subsidizing mortgages and refinancing. This program could spark $1.5 trillion in economic activity, save private citizens and business $10s (actually $100s) billions/year in energy/other costs, potentially pay for itself through increased tax revenue, accelerate a massive improvement in US building infrastructure energy efficiency with concurrent reduced energy use/pollution, and foster potentially 8.5 million jobs (with specific elements within to foster green jobs). For more, see: Massively effective way to stimulate the economy. Note, this is high on the list at Change.ORG and a recently introduced question at Change.GOV (you can vote to give these more visibility, if you wish).

Greening Affordable Housing (especially rental) While the above will drive huge investments in the private sector, including in rental units, we should assure ourselves that that the poorest are not left on the side. For roughly $30 billion, affordable-housing rental units can be brought to high energy efficiency levels, reducing utility costs and improving the living conditions for those renters.

Greening Transport: BruceMcF has, among others, highlighted several key initiatives including rail, increased rail-to-trails, and electrification of America’s rail infrastructure. As for the last, a $20 billion federal commitment in the coming two years with a total of perhaps $50 billion/year would help spark a matching private sector investment that would cut perhaps ten percent of America’s oil use, more than paying for the total cost via reduced imported oil costs (without even considering the benefits through reduced pollution, etc …). Combining increased public transport (both supporting improved current operations in the face of local budget cuts and investments in new infrastructure (whether plug-in-hybrid buses or light rail or nodal transport), funding for bike trails and improved pedestrian movement in urban areas, better traffic controls, subsidies for ever-more fuel efficient vehicle developments, electrification of rail and otherwise, the transport sector should see a minimum of $50 billion and preferably $100 billion of the stimulus package.

Accelerate Intelligent Grid / HVDC grid deployment Core to achieving an energy smart future will be an upgrading of the electrical grid to enable more demand management (controlling, for example, cooling loads to reduce peak demands), distributed power generation and storage, along with the introduction of cleaner energy options (whether renewables of all types, increased efficiency of use of existing resources, or nuclear power). The Stimulus Package included $8 billion for the smart grid. The funding for ’smart grid’ should be accelerated, along with acceleration of standards for appliances/such to be able to integrated into a smart(er) grid. (For example, right now refrigerator ‘auto-defrost’ cycles are random, being able to control these remotely would be invisible to users and enable reducing peak demand cycles.) As for a High-Voltage, Direct Cable, part of the “deal” for federal funding of electrification of rail should be access to rail right of way for HVDC lines for moving power around the country more efficiently. (As an aside, electrification of rail makes essentially every rail spur a potential location for a grid-supported distributed power source whether, for example, a wind turbine, concentrated solar power facility, or small nuclear reactor. The ‘connection’ to the grid would be near free and the construction supplies/equipment could be moved from site-to-site by rail, potentially greatly reducing the installation costs.) An additional 15 $20 billion, over the next two years, could spark real movement in these arenas.

Plug-In-Hybrid Electric School Buses (PHESBs) An example of a ‘narrow’ item, PHESBs are ready to go today, to be coming off the manufacturing line soon after orders flow. But, there are barriers to deploying them (especially as local communities slash procurement budgets to reduce deficits). A $100 million / year program for five years would move PHESBs from marginal (about 18 deployed in a test program) to core in purchasing. This program could easily move beyond school buses to other larger vehicles (think, for example, hotel / airport shuttle buses, local public transport, light trucks, etc …) but even ‘just’ school buses would have a wide range of real benefits beyond simply reducing fuel use, to improve student (and community) health with reduced diesel fumes, emergency power generation (imagine if there had been 15,000 mobile 50 kilowatt generators all around the areas affected by Katrina), and a path toward using centralized locations (schools, school bus maintenance lots) for introduction of localized power storage (Vehicle-to-Grid) as part of a smart(er) grid. While such a program could likely absorb more money, $100 million/year would spark a revolution in school transport and start protecting / creating jobs quickly (as school bus orders are plummeting).  School bus sales, an American industry, have plummeted as local governments around the country tighten their belts even further. This measure would spark some jobs (perhaps ‘just’ 2000) while setting the stage for transforming yellow buses across the nation.

AmeriTREC As part of the fostering of renewable energy and a new path forward, the United States should drive forward clean energy deployment (whether targeting Gore’s ten year or Google’s 20-year plans for eliminating coal from the electrical grid (or my 20 year plan). Efficiency is a key element for rapid and significant change, but introducing clean power is important as well. A network of concentrated solar thermal power (CSTP) plants along the US-Mexican border (both sides) could offer a real opportunity for change: clean electricity, employment, desalinated water supplies, ‘greening the desert’ with agriculture, and a path for potentially significant carbon sequestration while enriching the soil. Such an AmeriTREC might provide an effective path for providing a significant portion of America’s energy with all these ancillary benefits. Combined with using this as a path for ameliorating the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Perhaps $20 billion in commitment over the coming two years, with the doors open for more if these paths prove as successful as the promise suggests.  This would create some 200,000+ jobs while creating clean energy, clean water, and clean agriculture infrastructure for years and decades to come.

Greening Public Infrastructure: We must, as well, invest quite seriously in improving the energy efficiency of public infrastructure. Beyond “energy efficiency”, we should “green” our public infrastructure: reducing not just energy wastage but other resource wastage and other forms of pollution. The benefits will go well beyond fiscal savings, as discussed in Greening the School House. Dependent on the analysis and approach, this merits between $26 billion (a low-ball, basic energy efficiency figure, imo) and perhaps $100 billion over the coming two years.  A $100 billion program, split between general maintenance and Greening schools, would create (or, at least, protect) over one million jobs throughout America.

Renewable Energy Ammonia Fertilizer Production: Currently, fertilizer comes principally from natural gas and the fertilizer is key to providing enough nutrients for human nutrition. We must move to a cleaner process (even if moving toward more ‘organic’, natural production globally, much fertilizer will still be needed, at least for decades to come), not-reliant on a fossil fuel. The potential exists to foster wind-based fertilizer production, with even the potential for siting this in the Arctic region and having the ‘waste’ product be creation of large amounts of ice (reforming the Arctic ice shelf each year?) to help battle the devastation of global warming. $5 billion in the coming two years would move this process along smartly, creating working plants along with test programs for the more aggressive Arctic option.  This measure would create entire new industries, setting the stage for sustained job and economic growth, while creating some 50,000 jobs in the coming few years.

ARPA-E: The Stimulus package contained $400 million for the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) to support energy research and development projects around the nation. When ARPA-E put out a call for research proposals, for a tranche of $150 million, there were nearly 4000 proposals. (And those 4000 were just a small share of potential projects, as institutions pared down the numbers of proposals to avoid having too many proposals on the table.) Based on conversations with key players in this process, between 33-50 percent of the proposals (33 on a “high probability of success”, 50% with higher degree of risk) merited funding. At the end of the day, less than 2 percent of the proposals were funded.  ARPA-E could, without difficulty in terms of finding projects meriting funding, spend an order of magnitude more funding and not run out of great projects to execute.  Give ARPA-E $8 billion of additional funding for two years (with a commitment of at least this amount of funding to ARPA-E for the rest of the decade, or a commitment of $40 billion of additional clean energy research and development funding). This would create some 80,000 jobs while sparking inventions and developments to rocket America into a leadership position in the clean energy revolution.

Greening the Urban Space:  Greening public spaces, such as  done by groups like Sustainable South Bronx, in an incredibly powerful way to improve urban life, reduce pollution, and cut into the urban heat island.  We should dedicate at least $10 billion, over the coming two years, to changing the livability of America’s cities via greening public spaces and encouraging urban greening (such as greening roofs).  This would spark in the range of 100,000 jobs (including significant numbers in some of America’s most neediest communities, whether in the Bronx, Oakland, Anacostia, Southside Chicago, or East LA).

The key point

The jobs package won’t be perfect. I understand that. It will have elements that will help dig our holes deeper. The reality of the American political process and structure make this an inevitability. It will, as well, have elements that could help change the situation for the better. Our necessity is to maximize the second and minimize the first.

And, the reality, we have the opportunity before us for win-win-win-win solutions that will help get the US through (and out of) current economic doldrums, strengthen the economy into the future, reduce social inequity and strengthen society, reduce our polluting ways,  help turn us (as individuals, as the U.S., and as a global society) on a path toward a prosperous, climate-friendly future which creating huge numbers of Green Energy Jobs (JOBS! JOBS! JOBS!).

The challenges are real. The risks and dangers are not just real, but terrifying. In face of these challenges, we have a tremendous opportunity. We, quite literally, cannot afford to blow this opportunity. The win-win-win paths are there, we must work to convince the national leadership to chose them.

Stimulate Me

I … You … We must make the call on our leaders to stimulate U.S. toward something better, to not simply seek to breath life with ineffective and short duration jobs that will strengthen a polluting and wasteful economic structure that will drive us to even greater problems tomorrow.

My call …

Stimulate me, stimulate US to something better!

Clean Energy Jobs series posts:

Tags: cities · clean energy jobs

14 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Clean Energy Jobs Go to School // Nov 20, 2009 at 9:14 am

    [...] November 20th, 2009 · No Comments This is part of a series of posts on ‘clean energy jobs’ opportunities for sparking meaningful employment, quickly, in the United States as discussed in Clean Energy Jobs: Stimulate Me. [...]

  • 2 Clean Energy Jobs Go To the Market // Nov 20, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    [...] November 20th, 2009 · No Comments This is part of a series of posts on ‘clean energy jobs’ opportunities for sparking meaningful employment, quickly, in the United States as discussed in Clean Energy Jobs: Stimulate Me. [...]

  • 3 Clean Energy Jobs Take The PHE-School Bus // Nov 20, 2009 at 10:05 pm

    [...] November 20th, 2009 · No Comments This is part of a series of posts on ‘clean energy jobs’ opportunities for sparking meaningful employment, quickly, in the United States as discussed in Clean Energy Jobs: Stimulate Me. [...]

  • 4 Rod Adams // Nov 21, 2009 at 2:05 am

    Though you mention it favorably twice - at the end of a list - you have generally overlooked the value of a renewed nuclear energy industry as a way to stimulate US job in a way that is roughly analogous to the large hydroelectric dam construction of the 1930s.

    As Roosevelt figured out, if you had to put people to work, it was better to put them to work making items of real value that would provide useful power to do even more work. What Roosevelt might have guessed, but had no way of knowing, was that the hydroelectric dams constructed during his administration would provide clean power for several generations and would still be providing a significant portion of the electricity used by millions of Americans - even 70 years later.

    Our currently operating nuclear power plants - built with 1950s and 1960s vintage designs and technology - show evidence that they will still be operating after 60 years and may even go longer. They provide excellent, family wage jobs. I have several friends who are second and even third generation employees at the same plant who live in communities with solid education systems, good public parks, and even cultural activities enabled by the existence of a local nuclear power plant.

    With modern technology and building techniques, it is possible to build new plants in 5 years or less, but the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is being strapped for cash and resources so they are building up a queue of applicants who have to wait their turn in the review process. Due to a long hiatus in new construction, the NRC is training a lot of new employees who are still feeling their way through a redesigned process, but things will get better with adequate support - which, by current law, is paid for by billing the applicants. Unfortunately, the receipts go directly to the US Treasury and the NRC has to go through the normal 2-3 year delay in the budget cycle before they get increased resources.

  • 5 Clean Energy Jobs Blow In (not Blow Up) Coal River Mountain // Nov 21, 2009 at 11:18 pm

    [...] November 21st, 2009 · No Comments This is part of a series of brief posts on ‘clean energy jobs’ opportunities for sparking meaningful employment, quickly, in the United States as discussed in Clean Energy Jobs: Stimulate Me. [...]

  • 6 “Clean Energy Jobs Go To The Cleaners” // Nov 24, 2009 at 2:17 pm

    [...] November 24th, 2009 · No Comments This is part of a series of brief posts on ‘clean energy jobs‘ opportunities for sparking meaningful employment, quickly, in the United States as discussed in Clean Energy Jobs: Stimulate Me. [...]

  • 7 Clean Energy Jobs Conserve and Create // Dec 1, 2009 at 10:51 am

    [...] December 1st, 2009 · No Comments This guest post comes from Tim Lange (Meteor Blades), who was a founding (board) member of Energize America. This is posted as part of a serious looking at clean energy jobs‘ opportunities for sparking meaningful employment, quickly, in the United States as discussed in Clean Energy Jobs: Stimulate Me [...]

  • 8 Clean Energy Jobs come in small and BIG numbers … 10+ million of them // Dec 2, 2009 at 5:53 am

    [...] December 2nd, 2009 · No Comments This guest post comes from NBBooks), who was a founding (board). This is posted as part of a serious looking at clean energy jobs‘ opportunities for sparking meaningful employment, quickly, in the United States as discussed in Clean Energy Jobs: Stimulate Me [...]

  • 9 Clean Energy Jobs Go Swimming // Dec 2, 2009 at 8:19 am

    [...] December 2nd, 2009 · No Comments This is part of a series of brief posts on ‘clean energy jobs‘ opportunities for sparking meaningful employment, quickly, in the United States as discussed in Clean Energy Jobs: Stimulate Me. [...]

  • 10 How to create 1.7 million clean energy jobs | Going Green // Dec 2, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    [...] Get Energy Smart Now, A. Siegel has many more ideas and details of how to create millions of clean energy jobs [...]

  • 11 Apollo Daily Digest » Blog Archive » December 8, 2009: World Welcomes E.P.A. Endangerment Finding // Dec 8, 2009 at 2:51 am

    [...] Energy Smart! NOW!’s Clean Energy Jobs: Stimulate Me series collects articles exploring innovative ways Americans are working to build the clean energy [...]

  • 12 Clean Energy Jobs Go Home: $30 Billion to put 4.5 Million to Work // Dec 8, 2009 at 2:40 pm

    [...] Clean Energy Jobs Go Home: $30 Billion to put 4.5 Million to Work This is part of a series of brief posts on ‘clean energy jobs‘ opportunities for sparking meaningful employment, quickly, in the United States as discussed in Clean Energy Jobs: Stimulate Me. [...]

  • 13 The Most Environmentally Unfriendly Super Bowl Ad // Feb 8, 2010 at 2:05 pm

    [...] view of what can and should happen as America moves forward toward a prosperous, climate friendly, clean-energy [...]

  • 14 The political and practical necessity for bold action … not tactical retreat // Feb 23, 2010 at 10:45 am

    [...] with huge subsidies for polluting industries, it is time to step back and come out with an aggressive Clean Energy Jobs set of proposals that will put millions of Americans back to work (rapidly), turn the economic situation around, set [...]

Leave a Comment