Many Americans recognize that the introduction of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)standards was a key tools to reduce US oil demand in face of OPEC’s emergence and the various oil embargoes. While today liquid fuel (oil) and electricity have minimal overlap in most of the developed world, few recall that oil once provided a major share of U.S. electricity production and that “increased reliance on coal was a crucial part in the Carter Administration energy program” as part of the effort to reduce oil import requirements and the risks of foreign disruption of our fuel supplies.
With this in mind, on 3 April 1980, “the most trusted man in America” spent a few minutes exploring the implications of coal burning and its carbon dioxide for global warming.
While this was actually (somewhat) true before this, 35 years ago
scientists and a few politicians are beginning to worry a global energy planning does not take the greenhouse effect seriously enough
Sadly, the timeline was perhaps too optimistic:
they fear the earth will gradually become warmer causing as yet uncertain but possibly disruptive changes in the Earth’s climate fifty to seventy years from now
35 years ago they spoke of the potential impacts on sea level rise
if the earth gets too warm for example ice caps could not raising the level of the Seas possible probable we really don’t know but if it happens it means
goodbye Miami
goodbye Corpus Christi
goodbye Sacramento
goodbye Boston
goodbye to Orleans
goodbye charleston and Savannah
Perhaps this will be the children’s book to replace “Goodbye Moon” for later in the century, “Goodbye Miami ….”
It wasn’t, it seems, all dreary prospects for those ‘inside the Beltway’
on the positive side it means that we could enjoy boating at the foot of the Capitol and fishing on the south lawn