Get Energy Smart! NOW!

Blogging for a sustainable energy future.

Get Energy Smart!  NOW! header image 2

Why not 435? Or, even 535? And, that’s just voting members …

October 3rd, 2008 · No Comments

Yesterday, 152 members of the House of Representatives sent a letter to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi on climate principles. The elevator speech:

  • create jobs
  • clean energy
  • reduce pollution
  • protect consumers
  • With four key goals,

    1. Reduce emissions to avoid dangerous global warming;
    2. Transition America to a clean energy society;
    3. Recognize and minimize any economic impacts from global warming legislation; and
    4. Aid communities and ecosystems vulnerable to harm from global warming.

    Okay, this is not a perfect document (such as targeting US reductions of 15-20% current levels by 2020 and maintaining 80% below 1990 levels by 2050, which are both almost certainly inadequate), as commented on earlier this year. Actaully, it is a troubled document in many ways. But as a base level for conversations, at some point one has to wonder how any thinking individual, who actually pays credence to scientific knowledge, and concerned about the future would not be prepared to sign on to this letter as a minimum baseline for judging future legislation action. In a sane world, this letter would have 435 signatories, with many signing addendum letters calling for far more aggressive action. Sadly, too many still seek to pit environment against economy, failing to recognize that it is economy and environment. Sadly, too many remain committed to the global warming denial wing of the know-nothing branch of the flat-earth society and unwilling to question ideology in the face of scientific knowledge. Sadly …

    And, sadly, today the House passed a $700 billion (or so) bill that, even with its tax credits for renewable energy production and other good elements, will likely undermine any capacity to take serious action to tackle the perfect storm of Peak Oil and Global Warming.

    Sadly, this is a letter that should have unanimous consent but which faces an uphill battle, even though it clearly does not go far enough to deal with what we face.

    A key element of this letter: it is not a silver bullet, one answer to all challenges set of principles. It is thoughtful, seeking to discuss the interactive elements, with efforts to reduce CO2 emissions and efforts to mitigate inevitable impacts for pent-up warming that will hit us (the US) in coming years.

    Tip of the hat to Wonkroom and noting Greenpeace’s positive note on its release.

    The text of the letter:

    The text of the letter follows:

    Dear Madam Speaker,

    We salute your leadership on one of the critical issues of our time: the effort to save the planet from calamitous global warming. You have listened to the scientists and recognized the scope and severity of the threat that global warming poses to our nation’s security, economy, public health, and ecosystems. You have made enacting legislation to address global warming a top priority for Congress for the first time in our history. We stand ready to help develop this legislation and enact it into law.

    As part of this effort, we have developed a set of principles to guide Congress as it produces legislation to establish an economy-wide mandatory program to address the threat of global warming. Acting in accordance with these principles is critical to achieving a fair and effective bill that will avoid the most dangerous global warming and assist those harmed by the warming that is unavoidable, while strengthening our economy.

    The following are the principles we have developed to guide the creation of comprehensive global warming legislation.

    Comprehensive legislation to address global warming must achieve four key goals:

      Reduce emissions to avoid dangerous global warming;
      Transition America to a clean energy economy;
      Recognize and minimize any economic impacts from global warming legislation; and
      Aid communities and ecosystems vulnerable to harm from global warming.

    To meet each of these goals, climate change legislation must include the following key elements.

    Reduce Emissions to Avoid Dangerous Global Warming

    The United States must do its part to keep global temperatures from rising more than 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius) above pre-industrial levels. The scientific community warns that above this level, dangerous and irreversible changes to the Earth’s climate are predicted to occur. To meet this goal, the legislation must:

  • Review and respond to advancing climate science. The effects of global warming are happening much faster than scientists predicted several years ago, and there may be tipping points at which irreversible effects occur at lower levels of greenhouse gas concentrations than previously predicted. A mechanism for periodic scientific review is necessary, and EPA, and other agencies as appropriate, must adjust the regulatory response if the latest science indicates that more reductions are needed.
  • Make emissions targets certain and enforceable. Our strong existing environmental laws depend on enforceable requirements, rigorous monitoring and reporting of emissions, public input and transparent implementation, and government and citizen enforcement. All of these elements must be included in comprehensive global warming legislation. Cost-containment measures must not break the cap on global warming pollution. Any offsets must be real, additional, verifiable, permanent, and enforceable. The percentage of required emissions reductions that may be met with offsets should be strictly limited, and should be increased only to the extent that there is greater certainty that the offsets will not compromise the program’s environmental integrity.
  • Require the United States to engage with other nations to reduce emissions through commitments and incentives. The United States must reengage in the international negotiations to establish binding emissions reductions goals under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The legislation must encourage developing countries to reduce emissions by assisting such countries to avoid deforestation and to adopt clean energy technologies. This is a cost-effective way for the United States and other developed nations to achieve combined emissions reductions of at least 25% below 1990 levels by 2020, as called for by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  • Transition America to a Clean Energy Economy

    Global warming legislation provides an opportunity to create new jobs, while transforming the way we live and work through renewable energy, green buildings, clean vehicles, and advanced technologies. To realize this opportunity, the legislation must:

  • Invest in the best clean energy and efficiency technologies. A significant portion of revenues from auctioning emissions allowances should be invested in clean energy and efficiency measures, targeted to technologies and practices that are cleaner, cheaper, safer, and faster than conventional technologies, as determined through the application of clear standards set by Congress.
  • Include and encourage complementary policies. Complementary policies can lower program costs by producing lower-cost emissions reductions from economic sectors and activities that are less sensitive to a price signal. Smart growth measures, green building policies, and electricity sector efficiency policies are important types of complementary policies. The legislation should include federal complementary policies and encourage state and local complementary policies in areas better addressed by states and localities.
  • Preserve states’ authorities to protect their citizens. Federal global warming requirements must be a floor, not a ceiling, on states’ ability to protect their citizens’ health and state resources. Throughout our history, states have pioneered policies that the nation has subsequently adopted. Addressing global warming requires state and local efforts, as well as national ones.
  • Recognize and Minimize Any Economic Impacts from Global Warming Legislation

    Reducing global warming pollution will likely have some manageable costs, which would be far lower than the costs of inaction. To minimize any economic impacts, the legislation must:

  • Use public assets for public benefit in a fair and transparent way. Emissions allowances should be auctioned with the revenues going to benefit the public, and any free allocations should produce public benefits. If any allocations are given to polluters, they must be provided only to existing facilities for a brief transition period and the quantity must be limited to avoid windfall profits.
  • Return revenues to consumers. Revenues from auctioned allowances should be returned to low- and moderate-income households at a level sufficient to offset higher energy costs.
  • Return revenues to workers and communities. Workers and communities most affected by the transition to a clean energy economy should receive a portion of the revenues to ease the transition and build a trained workforce so that all can participate in the new energy economy.
  • Protect against global trade disadvantages to U.S. industry. In addition to providing incentives for developing countries to reduce emissions, the legislation should provide for an effective response to any countries that refuse to contribute their fair share to the international effort. These elements will protect energy-intensive U.S. enterprises against competitive disadvantage.
  • Aid Communities and Ecosystems Vulnerable to Harm from Global Warming

    Global warming is already harming communities and ecosystems throughout the world, and even with immediate action to reduce emissions and avoid dangerous effects, these impacts will worsen over the coming decades. To ameliorate these harms, the legislation must:

  • Assist states, localities, and tribes to respond and adapt to the effects of global warming. A portion of auction revenues should be provided to states, localities, and tribes to respond to harm from global warming and adapt their infrastructure to its effects, such as more severe wildfires, intensified droughts, increased water scarcity, sea level rise, floods, hurricanes, melting permafrost, and agricultural and public health impacts.
  • Assist developing countries to respond and adapt to the effects of global warming. A portion of auction revenues should be provided to help the developing countries most vulnerable to harm from global warming and defuse the threats to national security and global stability posed by conflicts over water and other natural resources, famines, and mass migrations that could be triggered by global warming. Vulnerable countries include least developed countries, where millions of people are already living on the brink, and small island states, which face massive loss of land.
  • Assist wildlife and ecosystems threatened by global warming. A portion of auction revenues should be provided to federal, state, and tribal natural resource protection agencies to manage wildlife and ecosystems to maximize the survival of wildlife populations, imperiled species, and ecosystems, using science-based adaptation strategies.
  • These principles, if adopted as part of comprehensive climate change legislation, will meet the United States’ obligations to curb greenhouse gas emissions and also will provide a pathway to the international cooperation that is necessary to solve the global warming problem.

    We commend these principles to you and hope that you find them helpful as we move forward together to develop and adopt global warming legislation.

    Here is the list of signatories. A question to ask: is your representative there? If not, will you contact his/her office to encourage them to sign up?

    Rep. Henry A. Waxman

    Rep. Thomas H. Allen

    Rep. John Lewis

    Rep. Lloyd Doggett

    Rep. Jim McDermott

    Rep. John P. Sarbanes

    Rep. Chris Van Hollen

    Rep. James P. McGovern

    Rep. Rush D. Holt

    Rep. Albio Sires

    Rep. John Conyers, Jr.

    Rep. Jane Harman

    Rep. Steven R. Rothman

    Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney

    Rep. Keith Ellison

    Rep. Zoe Lofgren

    Rep. Patrick J. Murphy

    Rep. Brian Baird

    Rep. Joe Sestak

    Rep. Andre Carson

    Rep. Tim Ryan

    Rep. Kathy Castor

    Rep. Brad Sherman

    Rep. Maxine Waters

    Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard

    Rep. Eliot L. Engel

    Rep. Donald M. Payne

    Rep. Peter Welch

    Rep. Linda T. Sánchez

    Rep. Dennis Moore

    Rep. Lynn C. Woolsey

    Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro

    Rep. Kirsten E. Gillibrand

    Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee

    Rep. Joseph Crowley

    Rep. Loretta Sanchez

    Rep. William D. Delahunt

    Rep. James L. Oberstar

    Rep. Wayne T. Gilchrest

    Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz

    Rep. Ben Chandler

    Rep. Brian Higgins

    Rep. Fortney Pete Stark

    Rep. Donna F. Edwards

    Rep. Robert E. Andrews

    Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr.

    Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson

    Rep. Ed Pastor

    Rep. John A. Yarmuth

    Rep. Xavier Becerra

    Rep. Alcee L. Hastings
    Rep. Edward J. Markey

    Rep. Earl Blumenauer

    Rep. Betty McCollum

    Rep. John W. Olver

    Rep. Mike Thompson

    Rep. Robert Wexler

    Rep. Raul M. Grijalva

    Rep. James P. Moran

    Rep. Henry C. “Hank’ Johnson, Jr.

    Rep. Howard L. Berman

    Rep. Paul W. Hodes

    Rep. Michael M. Honda

    Rep. Ellen O. Tauscher

    Rep. John F. Tierney

    Rep. Adam B. Schiff

    Rep. Bruce L. Braley

    Rep. Bobby L. Rush

    Rep. Anna G. Eshoo

    Rep. Neil Abercrombie

    Rep. Barbara Lee

    Rep. Steve Cohen

    Rep. Michael R. McNulty

    Rep. Betty Sutton

    Rep. Robert A. Brady

    Rep. Diana DeGette

    Rep. Jesse L. Jackson, Jr.

    Rep. Carol Shea-Porter

    Rep. Wm. Lacy Clay

    Rep. Doris O. Matsui

    Rep. Jose E. Serrano

    Rep. Robert C. “Bobby” Scott

    Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton

    Rep. Shelley Berkley

    Rep. Eni F.H. Faleomavaega

    Rep. Kendrick B. Meek

    Rep. Jackie Speier

    Rep. Phil Hare

    Rep. Charles B. Rangel

    Rep. Gwen Moore

    Rep. Timothy H. Bishop

    Rep. Gabrielle Giffords

    Rep. Steve Israel

    Rep. Tammy Baldwin

    Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich

    Rep. Madeleine Z. Bordallo

    Rep. Al Green

    Rep. Stephen F. Lynch

    Rep. Gregory W. Meeks

    Rep. Leonard L. Boswell

    Rep. Ron Klein

    Rep. Mel Watt
    Rep. Jay Inslee

    Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey

    Rep. Lois Capps

    Rep. Bob Filner

    Rep. Barney Frank

    Rep. Janice D. Schakowsky

    Rep. Mazie K. Hirono

    Rep. Susan A. Davis

    Rep. Steve Kagen

    Rep. Yvette D. Clarke

    Rep. Emanuel Cleaver

    Rep. Christopher S. Murphy

    Rep. Sam Farr

    Rep. Elijah E. Cummings

    Rep. Allyson Y. Schwartz

    Rep. Nita M. Lowey

    Rep. James R. Langevin

    Rep. Chaka Fattah

    Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy

    Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr.

    Rep. Anthony D. Weiner

    Rep. Jerrold Nadler

    Rep. Russ Carnahan

    Rep. Jerry McNerney

    Rep. Danny K. Davis

    Rep. Grace F. Napolitano

    Rep. David E. Price

    Rep. Hilda L. Solis

    Rep. David Wu

    Rep. Niki Tsongas

    Rep. Diane E. Watson

    Rep. Adam Smith

    Rep. Joe Courtney

    Rep. Louise McIntosh Slaughter

    Rep. Brad Miller

    Rep. Gary L. Ackerman

    Rep. Daniel Lipinski

    Rep. Norman D. Dicks

    Rep. Timothy J. Walz

    Rep. Corrine Brown

    Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez

    Rep. Carolyn McCarthy

    Rep. Donna M. Christensen

    Rep. Bennie G. Thompson

    Rep. John J. Hall

    Rep. David Loebsack

    Rep. Richard E. Neal

    Rep. Laura Richardson

    Rep. Rick Larsen

    Rep. Michael A. Arcuri

    Tags: climate change · Congress · Energy · Global Warming · politics