My blog posts are rarely about sartorial splendor but it seems sadly appropriate to share with you what I am wearing today: the t-shirt to the right. If you have difficulty reading or seeing it:
- the graphic is of a heating planet with melting ice caps, the Keeling Curve behind the globe, a smiley face on the globe, and
- the title: “The White House Effect”.
Almost old enough to merit the term “vintage“, this Union of Concerned Scientists shirt dates from Earth Day, 1990 … and, well, could well too sadly appropriate for Earth Day 2012. The decision on today’s clothing came late Friday while reading President Barack Obama’s Presidential Proclamation — Earth Day 2012 (provided after the fold). The statement seeks to create a balance between praising efforts to date while calling for actions for tomorrow with a not light dose of praise for the Administration’s efforts. Treading such a delicate line can lead to a fall too far to one side or another.
- Doom and gloom about tomorrow can undermine understanding and appreciation for what has been and can be achieved while weakening support for those (such as the Environment Protection Agency (EPA)) whose actions protect all of us and undermining energy for action. (‘Why bother since the world is heading toward disaster no matter what we do?’)
- Solely looking toward today’s challenges as if nothing has been achieved since the first Earth Day 42 years ago can be disrespectful to those who have fought so hard to achieve real impact and, again, can weaken support for those (such as the Environment Protection Agency (EPA)) whose actions protect all of us and undermine energy for action. (‘Why bother, since we can’t have an impact in the face of polluter interests and a dysfunctional political systems?’)
- Emphasizing improvements from the past situation while glossing over the seriousness of the situation we face, again, can weaken support for those (such as the Environment Protection Agency (EPA)) whose actions protect all of us and undermine energy for action. (‘Why bother being up in arms since we’re doing so much better and that progress is just going to continue no matter what I do?’)
- Embellishing achievements and suggesting that marginal programs have great positive impact while ignoring other steps that are worsening the situation, again, can weaken support for those (such as the Environment Protection Agency (EPA)) whose actions protect all of us and can undermine energy for action. (‘Why bother focusing on these issues, rather than other critical policy actions, because the Administration already has things well in hand?)
In seeking to tread this delicate line, the Administration seems to have almost certainly skewed far too much toward the second two while avoiding the first two to such an extent that an honest reader of the Presidential Proclamation might be hard pressed to realize that we quite likely face an existential threat when it comes to climate change and the myriad of other environmental challenges.
For understanding as to my choice of clothing, today, let us just take two examples and one minor omission from the Proclamation for illuminating the issues.
State of the Environment
Today, our air and water are cleaner, pollution has been greatly reduced, and Americans everywhere are living in a healthier environment.
Let us be clear. It has been awhile since Americans have seen a river burning, Acid Rain is reduced, lead poisoning is down, … We have seen real progress in many arenas. We have seen real progress even as there are very serious challenges and, in many ways, a worsening of the situation.
When it comes to pollution, for example, anyone want to suggest that CO2 pollution has been reduced from what it was 42 years ago? And, well, there are a myriad of other pollutants whose impact on Americans is far worse than when the first Earth Day occurred 42 years ago or when I first put on the shirt (front to the right about “The Green House Effect”) 22 years (and just about 22 pounds) ago.
Taking from someone else reacting to this Proclamation,
“Philip Shabecoff was the chief environmental correspondent for The New York Times for fourteen of the thirty-two years he worked there as a reporter. Poisoned for Profit, based on more than five years of investigative research and reporting, reveals the cumulative scientific evidence connecting the massive increase in environmental poisons to the epidemic of disability, disease, and dysfunction among our nation´s children.”
And how’s that Gulf Oil Spill cleanup going two years on?
As we work to leave our children a safe, sustainable future, we must also equip them with the tools they need to take on tomorrow’s environmental challenges. Supporting environmental literacy and a strong foundation in science, technology, engineering, and math for every student will help ensure our youth have the skills and knowledge to advance our clean energy economy. Last year, we launched the Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools recognition award to encourage more schools to pursue sustainability, foster health and wellness, and integrate environmental literacy into the curriculum. In the days ahead, we look forward to awarding the first Green Ribbons and recognizing the accomplishments of green schools across our country.
I would be the first to admit that historically our department has paid too little attention to the green school movement and promoting environmental stewardship.
Looking to the future of our planet, American leadership will continue to be pivotal as we confront the environmental challenges that threaten the health of both our country and the globe.
Today, our world faces the major global environmental challenge of a changing climate. Our entire planet must address this problem because no nation, however large or small, wealthy or poor, can escape the impact of climate change. The United States can be a leader in reducing the dangerous pollution that causes global warming and can propel these advances by investing in the clean energy technologies, markets, and practices that will empower us to win the future.
While our changing climate requires international leadership, global action on clean energy and climate change must be joined with local action.
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
Presidential Proclamation — Earth Day
EARTH DAY, 2012
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A PROCLAMATION
On April 22, 1970, millions of Americans came together to celebrate the first Earth Day. Students, teachers, activists, elected officials, and countless others challenged our Nation to confront our most urgent environmental issues and rallied around a single message: the success of future generations depends upon how we act today. As we commemorate Earth Day this year, we reflect on the challenges that remain before us and recommit to the spirit of togetherness and shared responsibility that galvanized a movement 42 years ago.
America rose to meet the call to action in the months and years that followed the first Earth Day. We passed the Clean Air, Clean Water, Endangered Species, and Marine Mammal Protection Acts; founded the Environmental Protection Agency; and ignited a spirit of stewardship that has driven progress for over four decades. Today, our air and water are cleaner, pollution has been greatly reduced, and Americans everywhere are living in a healthier environment.
While we have made remarkable progress in protecting our health and our natural heritage, we know our work is not yet finished. Last July, my Administration proposed the toughest fuel economy standards in our Nation’s history — standards that will save families money at the pump, cut greenhouse gas emissions, and significantly reduce our dependence on oil. In December, we finalized the first-ever national standards to limit mercury and other toxic emissions from power plants, helping safeguard the health of millions. We have taken action to protect and restore our Nation’s precious ecosystems, from the Gulf Coast to the Great Lakes. And we continue to make landmark investments in batteries, biofuels, and renewable energy that are unlocking American innovation and ensuring our Nation stays on the cutting edge. Our country is on the path to economic recovery and renewal, and moving forward, my Administration will continue to fight for a healthy environment every step of the way.
As we work to leave our children a safe, sustainable future, we must also equip them with the tools they need to take on tomorrow’s environmental challenges. Supporting environmental literacy and a strong foundation in science, technology, engineering, and math for every student will help ensure our youth have the skills and knowledge to advance our clean energy economy. Last year, we launched the Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools recognition award to encourage more schools to pursue sustainability, foster health and wellness, and integrate environmental literacy into the curriculum. In the days ahead, we look forward to awarding the first Green Ribbons and recognizing the accomplishments of green schools across our country.
Forty-two years ago, a generation rallied together to protect the earth we would inherit. As we reflect on that historic day of activism and stewardship, let us embrace our commitment to the generations yet to come by leaving them a safe, clean world on which to make their mark.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 22, 2012, as Earth Day. I encourage all Americans to participate in programs and activities that will protect our environment and contribute to a healthy, sustainable future.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-sixth.
9 responses so far ↓
1 John Egan // Apr 22, 2012 at 5:30 pm
Did you see the news out of France today? Not surprisingly, Hollande edged Sarkozy and leads in the polls for the run-off. But the real news is the 20% garnered by right-wing populist Marine Le Pen. Much of her support comes from rustbelt regions of France from working class voters who have lost jobs and futures in the neoliberal world economy and, thus, have turned towards right-wing populism.
This is not unlike the Tea Party movement in the Midwest in the U.S. or the BNP in Yorkshire and the Midlands in the U.K. or the various right-wing populist movements in Scandinavia. Nearly all of these areas were left bastions a generation or two ago.
The environmental cannot take hold unless the material is addressed with candor.
In all of these cases, the upper middle class has transitioned somewhat successfully into the neoliberal economy while the working class has lost out. Thus, for example, a doubling of gas prices has different meanings to different groups – – and vastly different political outcomes.
What is happening throughout Europe, in Australia, in Canada, and at least, on the state and Congressional level in the U.S. should provide some pause for reflection.
Once consigned to a permanent minority, the political left will have little chance of enacting even the most basic of environmental reforms.
2 sailrick // Apr 22, 2012 at 8:48 pm
John Egan
Remember Jerry Rubin and Abbie Hoffman, 1960s lefty activists?
To find an equivalent amount of extremism on the left, as now exists on the right, you would have to go back to the 1960s, but imagine that 100 Rubins and Hoffmans were in Congress, with several of them running for president.
3 sailrick // Apr 22, 2012 at 8:49 pm
OWS and N17
great graphic comparison of OWS and Tea Party
at David Appell’s blog. Here is most of it, without the graphics.
Public support for –
OWS 54% Tea Party 20%
Public against –
OWS 23% Tea Party 40%
Tea Party wealthier
Been to college-
92% of OWS 70% of Tea Party
Employed –
70% OWS (23% students)
56% Tea Party (30% retired)
OWS younger
Biggest Political party –
OWS 70% Independent
Tea Party 56% GOP
4 John Egan // Apr 23, 2012 at 3:15 am
Sailrick –
I have no idea what you are talking about with Rubin and Hoffman. What I have consistently argued with the blog author is that unless the parties of the left address materialist issues which have pusing millions in the middle and lower middle to the edge of the abyss – and which Nu Labour, SDP Lite, the DLC, and most Green parties have failed to do – – they will jettison these millions of voters who were once core constituents.
It has been played out over and over throughout the world in the past twenty years. But, apparently, some just dont get it.
5 President Obama edits out climate change from his Earth Day 2012 proclamation | Grist // Apr 23, 2012 at 12:23 pm
[…] A. Siegel notes in his excellent column on the proclamation: … there is nothing there about why ‘cutting greenhouse gas emissions’ […]
6 Greens Decry Obama Removal Of Climate Change From Earth Day Proclamation | Black Web Entertainment // Apr 23, 2012 at 2:11 pm
[…] therefore, zero mention of ‘climate change’ or ‘global warming’),” said A. Siegel, a blogger at Get Energy Smart! NOW. “While there is legitimate highlighting of the improved fuel economy standards, including […]
7 President Obama: “those who have looked at the science of climate change are scared” // Apr 25, 2012 at 11:37 am
[…] “The White House Effect”? […]
8 More Global Weirding: Slush Saturday – 80s Next Week || Conservation Minnesota // Apr 26, 2012 at 11:23 am
[…] toward science and most notably to climate science. The Obama Administration — including President Obama — has seemed (at best) reluctant to utter the words “climate change” and engage the anti-science mania dominating the Republican “elite” (and base) directly in a […]
9 Climate Denial: The GOP war on science should be the Democrats’ greatest political weapon… « UKIAH BLOG // Jun 11, 2012 at 6:08 am
[…] leading climate activists were astounded in disappointment that the president did not specifically mention climate change in […]