Anheuser-Busch makes much of its commitment to the environment:
Today, many companies are “going green.” But at Anheuser-Busch, we’re proud to say our tradition of environmental stewardship dates back to our founder, Adolphus Busch. In the late 1800s, he began recycling leftover grain from the brewing process, using it for cattle feed, a practice that continues today. …
We’re always looking for ways to operate more efficiently, while maintaining our quality standards, and be better stewards of the environment. It’s the right thing for the environment and our company.
Anheuser-Busch’s actual engagement with policy-making doesn’t necessarily live up to these stated ideals.
Anheuser-Busch makes noise as to their commitment to dealing with Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and global warming such as in this 2009 press release:
“In 2008, Anheuser-Busch’s U.S. breweries continued a 100-year company tradition of minimizing our impact on the environment in our operations by reducing fuel usage by 8.6 percent; electricity use by 5.1 percent; CO2 purchases by 30 percent; and water use by 13 percent,” said Peter Kraemer, Anheuser-Busch’s vice president of Supply. “All of these efforts combined reduced greenhouse gas emissions by nearly 10 percent. In addition to conservation, we’ve expanded our use of alternative fuels such as solar energy, wastewater we convert to methane gas to offset our use of natural gas, and landfill gas, and we have more alternative energy projects planned for this year and beyond, all while maintaining our high quality standards.”
“We believe in constantly evaluating ways to improve our environmental performance while maintaining our quality standards and have set challenging global targets to achieve our dream of becoming the ‘Best Beer Company in a Better World’,” Kraemer said. “Our celebration of World Environment Day is a global opportunity to unleash the creativity and caring of our employees so they could undertake small but impactful environmental projects at work and in their communities – all aimed at improving our environment.”
Yet, at best, there is uncertainty as to Anheuser-Busch’s real commitment. Climate Counts gave them a 51 out of 100 score, ‘striding’ with a major improvement, when it comes to climate issues. The marginal score resulted in part due to the fact that “Climate Counts found no public information to suggest that Anheuser-Busch supports public policy that addresses climate change.”
In fact, however, the public information might suggest otherwise.
Anheuser-Busch has a chair on the Board of Directors of the US Chamber of Commerce, which has been actively fighting moving forward with sensible climate legislation. The Chamber’s position is so severe that, in fact, multiple businesses (such as PG&E) have left the chamber, others have stepped down the board with public statements distancing themselves from the Chamber’s activities, and there is increasing criticism of the Chamber from voices across the United States.
And, there are mounting calls to turn up the pressure on the Chamber.
Bud and Bud Lite are supposed to lift our spirits; why would they want to hurt our planet?
And, Drinking Liberally has even put a carrot into the equation, promising some business if Anheuser-Busch steps up for the planet and steps away from the Chamber:
Join us in asking Anheuser-Busch to step down from the board of the Chamber of Commerce, and show us where their loyalties truly are — with us, their customers.
Other major companies including Apple and Pacific Gas and Electric have already stepped down. If Anheuser-Busch stands up for our environment, we’ll raise up a glass to them, and say, “This Bud’s for you.”
Until that moment, that Bud’s not for the planet … and certainly not for me.
3 responses so far ↓
1 Calls on Toyota to leave the Chamber // Oct 18, 2009 at 7:37 am
[…] to leave the Chamber, such as Credo/Drinking Liberally’s calling out of Anheuser-Busch (see That Bud’s Not for Me …), against other […]
2 Chamber of Commerce’s About Face: Good News for America // Oct 19, 2009 at 12:49 pm
[…] to leave the Chamber, such as Credo/Drinking Liberally’s calling out of Anheuser-Busch (see That Bud’s Not for Me …), MoveOn’s excellent initiative against Toyota, and other […]
3 Beer man // Oct 19, 2009 at 2:45 pm
Questionable weights on the score… for instance 2/5 for impact and the criteria to achieve 5/5 is > 10% reduction which is what they have achieved in CO2 emission reductions. That being said an overall of 51 with these questionable scores is actually better than most on the site and is the best in it’s category (beverages – beer). Sounds like Anheuser-busch has done quite a bit of measureable improvements towards the environment and are heading in the right direction. I would prefer to support a company that is making an effort than penalize them… There is always room to improve. This bud is for me!!!